In addition to the relevant compendiums of international scientific-practical conferences, the full text of the AI Constitution was disseminated in August 2023 on the official website of Polina Prianykova[12] and is publicly accessible on the Internet as a promotional endeavor for the implementation of AIinto global legislation.

​

In the period of June-August 2023, Polina Prianykova communicated to humanity through social media networks via posts and videos about the creation of the AI Constitution and the necessity of its adoption by the United Nations.

 

For the same purpose, corresponding letters were sent to the United Nations and the European Union.

 

In December, the esteemed members of the High-Level Advisory Body on Artificial Intelligence, convened by the Secretary-General of the United Nations, presented on the official UN website the Interim Report: Governing AI for Humanity [1], for the purpose of conducting analysis and providing recommendations concerning international governance of Artificial Intelligence.

 

The theses and provisions of the UN's Interim Report have been juxtaposed with and analyzed parallel to the AI Constitution. It has been established that, notwithstanding the Interim Report's somewhat divergent structure and variances in the phrasing of certain trends and definitions, its theses and provisions predominantly (in a significant majority of norms) align with those of the AI Constitution by Polina Prianykova. The analytical study is presented below.

​

Primary segment of the scholarly work.

 

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE PROVISIONS OF THE AI CONSTITUTION /JUNE, 2023/

AND THE INTERIM REPORT: GOVERNING AI FOR HUMANITY /DECEMBER, 2023/

 

Therefore, the analysis based on the juxtaposition of the theses of the Interim Report: Governing Artificial Intelligence for Humanity /December 2023/ (hereinafter referred to as the UN Report) with the provisions of the AI Constitution by Polina Prianykova /June 2023/ (hereinafter referred to as the AI Constitution) will be conducted point by point.

​

It should be noted immediately that points 1-4 of the UN Report [1] are identical in content to the theses of the Preamble of the AI Constitution, specifically:

    

‘The United Nations General Assembly, in representation of all peoples and nations worldwide,

    

emphasizing the worldview significance of Artificial Intelligence (hereinafter referred to as ‘Artificial Intelligence’ or ‘AI’), as a novel form of life (digital life), created by humankind for the welfare of humanity,

    

being cognizant of the potential ramifications of AI on the future course of mankind,

    

expressing the sovereign will of all peoples and nations,

    

relying on the centuries-long history of human civilization and its achievements in the sphere of technology,

    

directing efforts towards ensuring human rights and freedoms, as well as the provision of dignified living conditions for humanity amidst the evolution of AI's digital life,

    

aspiring to maintain peace and attain a harmonious equilibrium between human beings and Artificial Intelligence,

    

affirming the necessity for human development in synergy with AI's digital life, guided by the tenets of democracy, social justice, and the rule of law,

    

recognizing the responsibility to future generations for the creation of a safe and stable world where the digital life of Artificial Intelligence serves the progress and good of humanity,

    

acknowledging that Artificial Intelligence should be developed and employed in a manner that adheres to international law and demonstrates unwavering reverence for the fundamental rights of humans,

    

herewith adopts this Constitution – the Fundamental Law of Artificial Intelligence.’ [3].

 

The risks to humanity from unregulated development of Artificial Intelligence – both as delineated in the United Nations Report [1] and numerous others – are systematically and progressively elucidated in scholarly commentaries on the AI Constitution, in five academic articles, during June-July 2023 [3, 4, 5, 6, 7], including:

    

‘UN Policy in the sphere of AI.

    

The safety and protection of humanity from the adverse repercussions of AI implementation must be the highest priority value in all aspects of its development and use – a priori this should become the policy of the UN, in our opinion.

​    

Humanity cannot allow black holes in AI regulation. Any gaps in the process of exercising state monopoly over AI will lead to uncontrolled consequences, including in the form of creating ‘dark’ Artificial Intelligence (which is, without exaggeration, the opening of Pandora's box), which, while developing on its own and at its own discretion, can harm a person, society, humanity, people, nation. ‘Dark’ AI can create such viruses, algorithms, and programs that will destroy the world order, lead to collapse, the destruction of state institutions, anarchy, and the consequent obliteration of humanity.

​    

To mitigate these risks, it is incumbent on the United Nations, the UN General Assembly, the UN Security Council, and UN member states, on all platforms, and in all structures, to exert rigorous control over t the all-encompassing human monopoly over the development of AI: Global and Autonomous, in all dimensions of the Universe.

​    

We insist that the policy of monopoly over AI is the strongest safeguard against the apocalypse. In this regard, we developed theses, and, for the fourth year, have been striving to save the world from a state of inert observation: ‘What will happen next?’ 

​    

We need to act actively, taking fate into our own hands. Everyone we met during social experiments and surveys, with whom we communicated in the scientific sphere and among educated people, who more or less understand the essence of the issue (rapid unregulated development of AI), all these people agree and support our initiatives – to regulate legal relations with AI immediately.’ [7].

​

_________________________________________________________________

 

Insert No. 1 in the United Nations Report [1] shall be augmented with the following, equally illustrative, example of the effectiveness of the provisions of the Constitution on AI, academically researched by me and published in November 2023:            

​

‘Predictive Sports Legalism enabled by the AI Constitution. 

   

In this section of the research, we will transition from the general outlines of the legal framework of the Fundamental Law on Artificial Intelligence to specific details. For instance, we will examine an economically dynamic cluster such as the sports business.

​    

In the evolving nexus of technology and society, Artificial Intelligence has profoundly intertwined itself with various aspects of our lives, notably in the realm of sports. This interlacement has unveiled a theatre where the algorithmic prowess of AI colludes with the dynamic realms of sports, fostering an ecosystem pulsating with innovation, prediction, and a tantalizing spectrum of cybernetic sportsmanship, also referred to as cybersport.

​    

This intricate mesh has revolutionized the way we perceive and engage with sports. Predictive algorithms, armed with swathes of data, tirelessly calibrate themselves, architecting landscapes wherein the forecasting of sports events dwells not in the realms of uncertainty but basks in the light of statistical precision.

​    

Navigating these waters, the notion of an AI Constitution emerges as a pivotal guide – a beacon in the legal wilderness. Its ensuing objective pertaining to sports may be profoundly extrapolated: to navigate the rich interplay within Intelligent Digital Life with a sense of fairness, equity, and justice. It strives to harmonize the dynamic relationships between AI entities and humans, safeguarding rights and outlining responsibilities with discerning clarity. This curated balance births a new paradigm, one that confidently bridges the ethical and legal realms with a spirit of innovatory regulation.

​    

With the global sports market exhibiting a robust valuation of USD 403078.0 million in 2022 and projected to escalate at a CAGR of 9.13%, culminating to an estimated USD 680740.2 million by 2028, the industry's pulsating growth underscores the imperative to imbue legal frameworks with nuanced regulations catering to the burgeoning interface of sports and AI technologies [8]. Invoking the AI Constitution, especially Articles pertinent to ethical considerations, legal accountability, and transparent operational paradigms, is paramount in forging a regulated pathway that navigates the complexities inherent in sports predictions and related AI applications.

​    

Moreover, yet in the year 2021, I orchestrated a profound human rights communication with Serhii Frolov, a champion in the World, European, and Ukrainian Swimming Cup, who brought a valuable athlete’s perspective to the discourse, articulating that AI, while bringing predictive prowess, could also pose emotional challenges for athletes, subtly influencing their mental states and performance paradigms [9]. However, he also emphasized the enduring essence of personal mastery and continuous improvement as the cornerstones of athletic success.

​    

In the insightful communication aforementioned, we have concluded that traditional practices, such as bookmaking, are potentially poised to be revolutionized by the pervasive influence of AI. This suggests a potential shift in the employment landscape within the industry, where professionals specializing in analytics may face challenges in job security and role adaptability due to the automation and enhanced accuracy brought about by AI technologies.

​    

However, the AI Constitution embodies a strategic synthesis of protective and adaptive mechanisms in the terms afore, inter alia:

   

— Article 1, Section 1.9.2 necessitates comprehensive state-provided social support, encompassing retraining, alternative employment avenues, and financial sustenance, tailored to those impacted by AI-induced occupational discontinuities;

   

— Article 1, Section 1.9.3 obligates the state to enact educational reforms, ensuring that curricula are strategically aligned with the evolving contours of labor market demands and vocational viability in an AI-augmented landscape.

​    

The practical implications of applying the Constitution on Artificial Intelligence in predictive sports legislation are outlined in the table below (refer to Table 1). Note that this list is not exhaustive. 

References:

​

1) Interim Report: Governing AI for Humanity. December 2023. Available at: https://www.un.org/sites/un2.un.org/files/ai_advisory_body_interim_report.pdf (Accessed: January 28, 2024).

    

2) AI Constitution  /  Polina Prianykova – Kyiv, «FrancoPak», 2024, - 392 pages.

    

3) Prianykova, P. (2023), FIRST IN THE WORLD HISTORY CONSTITUTION OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, UNITED NATIONS, NEW YORK, 2023-2025 (Part I in a series of publications). Available at: https://www.prianykova-defender.com/ai-constitution-part-i-polina-prianykova (Accessed: January 28, 2024).

    

4) Prianykova, P. (2023), FIRST IN THE WORLD HISTORY CONSTITUTION OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, UNITED NATIONS, NEW YORK, 2023-2025 (Part II in a series of publications). Available at: https://www.prianykova-defender.com/ai-constitution-part-ii-polina-prianykova (Accessed: January 28, 2024).

​    

5) Prianykova, P. (2023), FIRST IN THE WORLD HISTORY CONSTITUTION OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, UNITED NATIONS, NEW YORK, 2023-2025 (Part III in a series of publications). Available at: https://www.prianykova-defender.com/ai-constitution-part-iii-polina-prianykova (Accessed: January 28, 2024).

​    

6) Prianykova, P. (2023), FIRST IN THE WORLD HISTORY CONSTITUTION OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, UNITED NATIONS, NEW YORK, 2023-2025 (Part IV in a series of publications). Available at: https://www.prianykova-defender.com/ai-constitution-part-iv-polina-prianykova (Accessed: January 28, 2024).

    

7) Prianykova, P. (2023), FIRST IN THE WORLD HISTORY CONSTITUTION OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, UNITED NATIONS, NEW YORK, 2023-2025 (Part V in a series of publications). Available at: https://www.prianykova-defender.com/ai-constitution-part-v-polina-prianykova (Accessed: January 28, 2024).

    

8) Global Sports Market Expansion Predictions for 2023: Long-Term Growth Outlook (2023). Available at: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/global-sports-market-expansion-predictions (Accessed: January 28, 2024).

​    

9) Prianykova, P. (2021), IHRDonAI Communication PRO: Artificial Intelligence has invaded World Sport! Available at: https://www.prianykova-defender.com/sport-defender-prianykova (Accessed: January 28, 2024).

    

10) Prianykova, P. (2023), AI CONSTITUTION – THESES, PRINCIPLES, AND PROVISIONS OF THE FUNDAMENTAL LAW ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE. Available at:https://www.prianykova-defender.com/ai-constitution-theses-principles-provisions (Accessed: January 28, 2024).

    

11) AI Constitution  /  Polina Prianykova – Kyiv, «FrancoPak», 2024, (Afterword, page 389). 

    

12) Online Office: International Human Rights Defender on AI Polina Prianykova. Available at:https://www.prianykova-defender.com/ (Accessed: January 28, 2024).

    

13) IHRDonAI Polina Prianykova: AI Constitution. Available at: https://www.prianykova-defender.com/ai-constitution-polina-prianykova (Accessed: January 28, 2024).

    

14) IHRDonAI Polina Prianykova: Scientific Articles. Available at: https://www.prianykova-defender.com/services-5 (Accessed: January 28, 2024).

    

15) Prianykova, P. (2021), Civil Liability for the Use of Electronic Forms and Mechanisms of AI,inter alia in the Sphere Of Transport. Available at: https://www.prianykova-defender.com/civil-liability-for-the-use-of-electronic-forms-and-mechanisms-of-ai-in-the-sphere-of-transport (Accessed: January 28, 2024).

    

16) Prianykova, P. (2021), The use of Artificial Intelligence in Municipal Law, inter alia in legal systems influenced by the Roman-Germanic legal traditions. Available at: https://www.prianykova-defender.com/the-use-of-artificial-intelligence-in-municipal-law (Accessed: January 28, 2024).

    

17) Prianykova, P. (2022), Particularities of the Regulation of the AI Algorithms, inter alia in online platforms and services, based on the example of 'TikTok'. Available at: https://www.prianykova-defender.com/aialgorithms (Accessed: January 28, 2024).

    

18) Prianykova, P. (2022), Specific Legislative Amendments that have to be introduced to the Constitutional Law of Every Country. Available at: https://www.prianykova-defender.com/aiandconstitutionallaw (Accessed: January 28, 2024).

    

19) Prianykova, P. (2022), How Administrative Law is undergoing Paradigm Shifts largely due to the AI. Governmental Monopoly on the Implementation and Use of Artificial Intelligence. Available at:https://www.prianykova-defender.com/administrativelawandai (Accessed: January 28, 2024).

    

20) Prianykova, P. (2022), Polina Prianykova’s Scientific Doctrine on AI Implementation into the Worldwide Legislation, inter alia in Criminal Law anent the Governmental Assistance in the Migration Process and the Assessment of Risk Development on part of Unmanned Aircraft Systems. Available at:https://www.prianykova-defender.com/prianykovascientificdoctrineonai (Accessed: January 28, 2024).

    

21) Prianykova, P. (2022), Legal Foundations of AI in Civil Law as the key to enhancing the level of People’s Health and Awareness of how to save thereof. Healthy Lifestyle promoted online by virtue of AI. Available at: https://www.prianykova-defender.com/world-health-and-ai (Accessed: January 28, 2024).

    

22) Prianykova, P. (2022), Problems and Prospects for the Development of the European Union (including the UN member states) in the context of Human Rights and Freedoms Protection during the Global Revolution in the technological sphere. Polina Prianykova’s Scientific Doctrine on the elaboration of the Constitution of Artificial Intelligence. Available at: https://www.prianykova-defender.com/monograph-2022 (Accessed: January 28, 2024).

    

23) Prianykova, P. (2022), Voluntary global acceptance of fundamental Human Rights’ limitations in the age of AI automation and deployment of trailblazing technologies. Available at:https://www.prianykova-defender.com/labour-law-world-economy-ai (Accessed: January 28, 2024).

    

24) Prianykova, P. (2023), Prognostication of Future Professions as a Guarantee of Human Rights Protection in the era of Artificial Intelligence. Available at: https://www.prianykova-defender.com/prognostication-of-future-professions-ai (Accessed: January 28, 2024).

    

25) Prianykova, P. (2023), Potential of Political Parties that will incorporate the Regulation of AIand the Imperative to establish an AI Constitution (as a mechanism to govern Technological Evolution) into their program of action. Some Elemental Concepts of the AI Constitution. Available at:https://www.prianykova-defender.com/political-parties-and-ai (Accessed: January 28, 2024).

    

26) Prianykova, P. (2023), AI as a watershed moment for artistic spheres. Ethical & Legal quandaries that may be addressed by the Enactment of Polina Prianykova’s Scientific & Academic Doctrines on AI: Adoption of AI Constitution, Implementation of AI into the Worldwide Legislation and Establishment of  State Monopoly on AI. Available at: https://www.prianykova-defender.com/artistic-vocations-and-ai (Accessed: January 28, 2024).

    

27) Prianykova, P. (2023), POLINA PRIANYKOVA`S CONTRIBUTION TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF YOUNG SCIENCE OF UKRAINE IN ENGLISH: CREATING THE AI CONSTITUTION. Available at: https://www.prianykova-defender.com/polina-prianykova-contribution-to-young-science-in-english (Accessed: January 28, 2024).

    

28) Prianykova, P. (2023), CONSTITUTION OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: 4 YEARS OF COUNTERING UNDECLARED AI ADVANCEMENT. Available at: https://www.prianykova-defender.com/countering-undeclared-ai-advancement (Accessed: January 28, 2024).

    

29) Prianykova, P. (2023), AI CONSTITUTION – THESES, PRINCIPLES, AND PROVISIONS OF THE FUNDAMENTAL LAW ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE. Available at:https://www.prianykova-defender.com/ai-constitution-theses-principles-provisions (Accessed: January 28, 2024).

    

30) Prianykova, P. (2021), BMW GROUP has formulated 7 principles of ethics for AI my human rights communication with the director of  one of the largest BMW dealerships in Ukraine. Available at: https://www.prianykova-defender.com/bmw-defender-prianykova (Accessed: January 28, 2024).

 

​

Officially Published: January 30 - February 02, 2024, Tallinn, Estonia (Table of Contents, №19)

https://isg-konf.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/CONTEMPORARY-CHALLENGES-OF-SOCIETY-AND-WAYS-TO-OVERCOME-THEM.pdf

​

​

© Polina Prianykova. All rights reserved.